<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scriptygoddess &#187; Call for help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/category/call-for-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Call for help &#8211; strange search problems</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2009/01/08/call-for-help-strange-search-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2009/01/08/call-for-help-strange-search-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Hacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/?p=1556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been a while since I made a plea for help on here. But this time I&#039;m really stumped. Here&#039;s the short story: A brand new clean install of wordpress &#8211; no plugins, no posts even except the default post. No funky characters in the blogs name. As plain vanilla as you can get. Run [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s been a while since I made a plea for help on here. But this time I&#039;m really stumped.</p>
<p>Here&#039;s the short story:<br />
A brand new clean install of wordpress &#8211; no plugins, no posts even except the default post. No funky characters in the blogs name. As plain vanilla as you can get. Run a search that BEGINS with the letter &#034;d&#034; and it hangs.</p>
<p>I thought it might be a wordpress 2.7 issue, so I tried installing an older version of wordpress. Nope. Same problem.</p>
<p>In this case the hosting is a dedicated virtual server account with Media Temple. (for a client). I have other clients hosted on Media Temple (different accounts) that run wordpress and none of them are having this problem.</p>
<p>There was a <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/217637?replies=5">workaround posted on the support forums</a>, basically in the search form tag I changed it from this:<br />
<code>&lt;form method="get" action="&lt;?php bloginfo('url'); ?&gt;/"&gt;</code><br />
to this:<br />
<code>&lt;form method="get" action="&lt;?php bloginfo('url'); ?&gt;/index.php"&gt;</code></p>
<p>and magically it works. But doesn&#039;t that seem kind of strange. Any other search went through fine &#8211; why the letter &#034;d&#034;. And what&#039;s also strange is that Media Temple support reps did NOT have this problem &#8211; not unless they used a proxy server. ?!?!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2009/01/08/call-for-help-strange-search-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSS &quot;TOC&quot; style?</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/03/08/css-toc-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/03/08/css-toc-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS related]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/03/08/css-toc-style/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just curious&#8230; is there a fancy way to do something like this in CSS: Introduction &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Page 1 Information &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Page 2 More Info &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Page 3 &#8230; where the &#034;Page&#034; text lines up and the &#034;&#8230;..&#034; just fills in until it reaches the &#034;Page&#034; text&#8230; kind of like you&#039;d see in a table [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m just curious&#8230; is there a fancy way to do something like this in CSS:</p>
<p>Introduction &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Page 1<br />
Information &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Page 2<br />
More Info &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Page 3</p>
<p>&#8230; where the &#034;Page&#034; text lines up and the &#034;&#8230;..&#034; just fills in until it reaches the &#034;Page&#034; text&#8230; kind of like you&#039;d see in a table of contents in a book? (Ideally the &#034;&#8230;.&#034; wouldn&#039;t even be text in the markup. It would just be a background fill or something&#8230;) Is that even possible?</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Jenna got me on the right track&#8230;. (Thank you!) <img src='http://www.scriptygoddess.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Make each line part of a list item. Apply the background image to &lt;li&gt; style. Wrap each part with another tag. Float one right, the other left, and give them both a solid color background the same as the rest of the page (so that it covers the dot, so it won&#039;t show through under the text). I also wanted the right column to line up, so I gave it a width, and told the text to align-left. <a href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/resources/1460/test.htm">Here&#039;s the example.</a> </p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/03/08/css-toc-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox underlining images</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/02/21/firefox-underlining-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/02/21/firefox-underlining-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/02/21/firefox-behavior/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone help me out before I go crazy. Why is firefox underlining the image in this example? Here is a screenshot (in case you&#039;re not using firefox) &#8211; the above link looks like this in firefox: The code on that page is simply: &#60;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"&#62; &#60;html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&#62; &#60;head&#62; &#60;meta [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone help me out before I go crazy.<br />
Why is firefox underlining the image in <a href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/resources/1458/imageunderline.htm">this example</a>?<br />
Here is a screenshot (in case you&#039;re not using firefox) &#8211; the above link looks like this in firefox:<br />
<img src="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/resources/1458/imageunderline.jpg" alt="weird underline in firefox" /></p>
<p>The code on that page is simply:<br />
<code>&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"&gt;<br />
&lt;html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;<br />
&lt;head&gt;<br />
&lt;meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /&gt;<br />
&lt;title&gt;Untitled Document&lt;/title&gt;<br />
&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;<br />
&lt;!--<br />
a img {<br />
	text-decoration: none;<br />
	border: none;<br />
}<br />
--&gt;<br />
&lt;/style&gt;<br />
&lt;/head&gt;<br />
&lt;body&gt;<br />
&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;img src="gecko.gif" alt="gecko" /&gt; Test&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;img src="gecko.gif" alt="gecko" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="#"&gt;Test&lt;/a&gt;<br />
&lt;/body&gt;<br />
&lt;/html&gt;</code></p>
<p>I thought it might be a doctype issue &#8211; but changing it doesn&#039;t seem to make a difference.</p>
<p><strong>Added after:</strong> Just to make this even more mysterious&#8230; This DOES NOT create that line:<br />
<code>&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;img src="gecko.gif" alt="gecko" /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;</code><br />
It doesn&#039;t show up until we add a *character*  within the &lt;a&gt; tag that the underline pops up&#8230;(I&#039;ve updated the example to show this&#8230;)</p>
<p><strong>Updated 3/30/07</strong> <a href="http://wolfmotor.com/">Shaun</a> wins the prize for finding the solution!:<code>a img {<br />
display:block;<br />
border: none;<br />
float: left;<br />
}</code></p>
<p>The example has been updated&#8230;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/02/21/firefox-underlining-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tools for Web Development on the Mac?</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/12/09/tools-for-web-development-on-the-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/12/09/tools-for-web-development-on-the-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/12/09/tools-for-web-development-on-the-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last time I did any extensive web dev on the mac was about&#8230; oh, maybe SIX! years ago. Eek, I feel old. In any case, I&#039;ve been doing everything on the PC since then, and while I have a number of really great tools on the PC that I like, I&#039;m clueless when it [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I did any extensive web dev on the mac was about&#8230; oh, maybe SIX! years ago. Eek, I feel old. In any case, I&#039;ve been doing everything on the PC since then, and while I have a number of really great tools on the PC that I like, I&#039;m clueless when it comes to mac tools.</p>
<p>On the PC, the tool that I use the most is Dreamweaver. Not so much for it&#039;s &#034;WYSIWYG&#034; feature, that doesn&#039;t work too well for me, but it does auto-complete HTML tags, it knows php functions and can tell me what data types I have to pass in, does code highlighting. I even use it to make my stylesheets, because I can get it to pull up the &#034;correct&#034; way to write out a style definition if I forget (which is often).</p>
<p>So what tools do I need to do development on the Mac? I&#039;ve downloaded a trial copy of <a href="http://westciv.com/style_master/index.html">Westciv Stylemaster</a> which seems to give me what I need for writing stylesheets. I have BBEdit, but it doesn&#039;t do the auto-complete stuff like dreamweaver does (of if it DOES, I can&#039;t find it!).</p>
<p>Cany anyone make some recomendations? (Post in the comments please)</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/12/09/tools-for-web-development-on-the-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sticky Posts in WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/09/27/sticky-posts-in-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/09/27/sticky-posts-in-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Bookmarks to Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/09/27/sticky-posts-in-wordpress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to create a sticky post (as in, make one post stay on top above &#034;newer&#034; posts &#8211; until I indicate otherwise) Previously, I had blogged this link on Weblog Tools Collection &#8211; I now notice there is an update post which points you to oomsonline to these instructions. However upon reading in the [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m trying to create a sticky post (as in, make one post stay on top above &#034;newer&#034; posts &#8211; until I indicate otherwise)</p>
<p>Previously, I had blogged <a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2003/12/18/sticky-posts-hack-for-wordpress/">this link</a> on Weblog Tools Collection &#8211; I now notice there is an <a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/07/23/more-sticky-hack-for-wordpress-12/">update post</a> which points you to <a href="http://oomsonline.com/">oomsonline</a> to <a href="http://oomsonline.com/sticky_hack.txt">these instructions</a>. However upon reading in the instructions that it required a manual edit to the database (and I was in a lazy mood) I decided to look further.</p>
<p>On the wiki I found a link <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/10/7128">here on the wp support boards</a> which linked to another type of plugin. I gave it a try &#8211; but ran into problems. (it simply didn&#039;t seem to work)</p>
<p>Then I found &#034;<a href="http://www.asymptomatic.net/wp-hacks">Adhesive</a>&#034; which I also tried, but ran into problems. (It creates a checkbox that you check if you want it to be sticky &#8211; however, I would check the checkbox, and it wouldn&#039;t stay checked after I saved my changes.)</p>
<p>Granted &#8211; I suspect at least SOME of these problems may be in part because my index.php page is heavily customized. Aside from the confusion of the multiple plugins/hacks that seem to do the same thing &#8211; are there others out there that have had better success? Is the first one to weblogtoolscollection reliable enough that it&#039;s worth the manual change to the database?</p>
<p><b>UPDATE:</b> Not quite sure what was going on before &#8211; but <a href="http://www.asymptomatic.net/wp-hacks">Adhesive</a> suddenly started to work for me. And I&#039;m very happy with it. <img src='http://www.scriptygoddess.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/09/27/sticky-posts-in-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mySQL statements &#8211; order by and group by</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2002/11/15/mysql-statements-order-by-and-group-by/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2002/11/15/mysql-statements-order-by-and-group-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call for help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2002/11/15/mysql-statements-order-by-and-group-by/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone out there know mySQL really well? I understand what order by does, and I understand what group by does. Can these two be used together? If so, how does it work? Does it group stuff together and then WITHIN the groups do the order_by? ie. If we had a database of people&#039;s info &#8211; [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone out there know mySQL really well? I understand what <a href="http://sqlcourse2.com/orderby.html" target="_blank">order by</a> does, and I understand what <a href="http://sqlcourse2.com/groupby.html" target="_blank">group by</a> does. Can these two be used together? If so, how does it work? Does it group stuff together and then WITHIN the groups do the order_by? ie. If we had a database of people&#039;s info &#8211; and we did:<br />
<h3>SELECT lastname, age FROM people GROUP BY lastname ORDER BY age DESC</h3>
<p>would it list the the youngest to oldest people with the same last name &#8211; and then move onto the next group of lastnames, etc.? Would that be sorting the last names arbitrarily? If you wanted to sort the last names *reverse* alphabetically as well would you do this?:<br />
<h3>SELECT lastname, age FROM people GROUP BY lastname ORDER BY lastname ASC, age DESC</h3>
<p>Actually re-reading the GROUP BY descriptiong&#8230; maybe I DON&#039;T understand GROUP BY&#8230; =sigh= anyone wanna help explain?</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2002/11/15/mysql-statements-order-by-and-group-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

