<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: floated box with extra (unintented) margin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/01/22/floated-box-with-extra-unintented-margin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/01/22/floated-box-with-extra-unintented-margin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DianeV</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/01/22/floated-box-with-extra-unintented-margin/#comment-497164</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2007/01/22/floated-box-with-extra-unintented-margin/#comment-497164</guid>
		<description>I'd not seen that. I'd been using IE hacks to get around the IE-double-the-margin-what-were-we-thinking thing. Display:inline might be more elegant (and less fraught with peril).

... I really don't know what Microsoft was thinking. Why would they think that, if you specify a 50px margin, what you *really* want is a 100px margin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d not seen that. I&#039;d been using IE hacks to get around the IE-double-the-margin-what-were-we-thinking thing. Display:inline might be more elegant (and less fraught with peril).</p>
<p>&#8230; I really don&#039;t know what Microsoft was thinking. Why would they think that, if you specify a 50px margin, what you *really* want is a 100px margin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.281 seconds -->
