<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Button Element</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/10/25/button-element/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/10/25/button-element/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/10/25/button-element/#comment-12992</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2004/10/25/button-element/#comment-12992</guid>
		<description>I agree that common UI elements should ideally be left alone unstyled, and if styled then _look like what they represent_.

A valid point on the button element: Netscape 2-6 doesn't render it at all, it seems. I think that's why it's so rarely used.
http://www.ehtml.com/html/reference/button.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that common UI elements should ideally be left alone unstyled, and if styled then _look like what they represent_.</p>
<p>A valid point on the button element: Netscape 2-6 doesn&#8217;t render it at all, it seems. I think that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so rarely used.<br />
<a href="http://www.ehtml.com/html/reference/button.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ehtml.com/html/reference/button.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.247 seconds -->
