Comments on: Napster vs. iTunes http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/ Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:36:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: GigaOm http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10729 GigaOm Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10729 <trackback /><strong>Now MTV goes for Music Downloads</strong> The question is: what took them so long. MTV, arguably the single best music brand out there is getting into the music downloading business. Or as they say, it is crashing the party, now that its brand is being upstaged... Now MTV goes for Music Downloads
The question is: what took them so long. MTV, arguably the single best music brand out there is getting into the music downloading business. Or as they say, it is crashing the party, now that its brand is being upstaged…

]]> By: Rich Blinne http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10726 Rich Blinne Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10726 I pretty much have all the options for music. Napster is a jack of all trades but a master of none. Rhapsody has better selection for streaming. iTunes has better selection for downloads and more complete albums. MusicMatch has the best music guides and because its radio can use compulsory licenses you can hear tunes for artists and labels who desire to be horses' rear ends. My usage model is as follows: 1. Passive exploration: Music Match 2. Active exploration: Rhapsody 3. Purchase: iTunes If you want all of the above in one place Napster is probably your best choice. I have found tunes that only exist on one of the four. Thus, Steve Jobs lack of support for WMF is distressing to me. See my comments on this <a href="http://www.blinne.org/blog/2003/10/winner_take_all.html" target="_blank">here</a>. I pretty much have all the options for music. Napster is a jack of all trades but a master of none. Rhapsody has better selection for streaming. iTunes has better selection for downloads and more complete albums. MusicMatch has the best music guides and because its radio can use compulsory licenses you can hear tunes for artists and labels who desire to be horses’ rear ends. My usage model is as follows:

1. Passive exploration: Music Match
2. Active exploration: Rhapsody
3. Purchase: iTunes

If you want all of the above in one place Napster is probably your best choice. I have found tunes that only exist on one of the four. Thus, Steve Jobs lack of support for WMF is distressing to me. See my comments on this here.

]]> By: James http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10727 James Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10727 iTunes is so much better. Clunky interface? What are you smoking? iTunes is so much better. Clunky interface? What are you smoking?

]]> By: John http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10728 John Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10728 I expect that you have the same issues with NAPSTER as you did with BuyMusic.com... at least in regards to the ROXIO plugin. Napster and Buymusic.com both use Windows Media Player 9 to play/burn the <a href="http://www.CopyProtectedWMA.com">copy protected WMA files<a> to Audio CD. As I understand it, the only way to burn the music from WMP is via the Roxio components. John I expect that you have the same issues with NAPSTER as you did with BuyMusic.com… at least in regards to the ROXIO plugin.

Napster and Buymusic.com both use Windows Media Player 9 to play/burn the
<a href=”http://www.CopyProtectedWMA.com”>copy protected WMA files<a>
to Audio CD. As I understand it, the only way to burn the music from WMP is via the Roxio components.

John

]]> By: Christine http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10725 Christine Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10725 Based on the "The "unlimited downloading" for $9.95 a month option" - I may have to test this out and compare it to Listen.com - which I absolutely LOVE. I can listen to all the music I want on my PC for $9.95 a month, organized in to a nice library, and it rocks. However, to burn tracks is 80 cents a song, and I haven't tested it yet. The Napster option may be a better deal because you can download them - you have to be online to use Listen.com. When I test them out, I will write up a comparision of the two and post it, if that's ok with you! :) Based on the “The “unlimited downloading” for $9.95 a month option” - I may have to test this out and compare it to Listen.com - which I absolutely LOVE. I can listen to all the music I want on my PC for $9.95 a month, organized in to a nice library, and it rocks. However, to burn tracks is 80 cents a song, and I haven’t tested it yet. The Napster option may be a better deal because you can download them - you have to be online to use Listen.com.

When I test them out, I will write up a comparision of the two and post it, if that’s ok with you! :)

]]> By: Dave http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10724 Dave Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10724 I did my own <a href="http://www.metzener.com/dave/archives/000110.php">review</a> yesterday, it's not professional, but I'm going to have to update it today. Now personally, I have some serious problems with the iTunes interface. Jobs says it's the best Windows App ever, well, I have some comments to make back to him about what he thinks a good Windows App is... I burned my 5 free songs just after downloading them, the burn worked just fine. Minus the interface issues that Apple has, the two stores are pretty much the same. Napster's claim of 500,000 songs confuses me, however. I looked at Barenaked Ladies latest album Everthing for Everyone, and noticed that there were tracks missing from the album. 3 to be precise. One of which was Anohter Postcard, their hit song being played on the radio now. So I looked for the song specificially, and found it under the album Another Postcard. Not sure what the point of that was other than getting more money. The "unlimited downloading" $9.95 a month option, sounds better than it really is. From what I can tell, you can download all the tracks you want, however, you are not going to be able to play them anywhere other than the Napster player, not even burn them. If you want to do that, you are still going to have to pay for them. So I'm not really sure what the benefit of this $10 a month service is, other than being able to "preview" the entire song before buying it. However, for $10 a month, I should get at least a couple of free tracks a month or something. Now I'm a little biased since I own an iPod, so I'm going to be sticking with iTunes Music Store simply because converting WMA files to MP3 or AAC files requires burning the songs to a CD then re-ripping them into the format I want. Also, even though they have been in beta testing for a while, the "preview" opening was having all kinds of problems staying connected to their servers. Yesterday there were still having problems, however so far today, they seem to be having less problems. I did my own review yesterday, it’s not professional, but I’m going to have to update it today.

Now personally, I have some serious problems with the iTunes interface. Jobs says it’s the best Windows App ever, well, I have some comments to make back to him about what he thinks a good Windows App is…

I burned my 5 free songs just after downloading them, the burn worked just fine. Minus the interface issues that Apple has, the two stores are pretty much the same.

Napster’s claim of 500,000 songs confuses me, however. I looked at Barenaked Ladies latest album Everthing for Everyone, and noticed that there were tracks missing from the album. 3 to be precise. One of which was Anohter Postcard, their hit song being played on the radio now. So I looked for the song specificially, and found it under the album Another Postcard. Not sure what the point of that was other than getting more money.

The “unlimited downloading” $9.95 a month option, sounds better than it really is. From what I can tell, you can download all the tracks you want, however, you are not going to be able to play them anywhere other than the Napster player, not even burn them. If you want to do that, you are still going to have to pay for them. So I’m not really sure what the benefit of this $10 a month service is, other than being able to “preview” the entire song before buying it. However, for $10 a month, I should get at least a couple of free tracks a month or something.

Now I’m a little biased since I own an iPod, so I’m going to be sticking with iTunes Music Store simply because converting WMA files to MP3 or AAC files requires burning the songs to a CD then re-ripping them into the format I want.

Also, even though they have been in beta testing for a while, the “preview” opening was having all kinds of problems staying connected to their servers. Yesterday there were still having problems, however so far today, they seem to be having less problems.

]]> By: yoshi http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10723 yoshi Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10723 Recording to CD is easy. Because of the partnership with Roxio, it makes it that much easier to burn to CD. I had no issues. :) Because of the WMA content though, unfortunately it may never be on the Mac, which is a downer. Recording to CD is easy. Because of the partnership with Roxio, it makes it that much easier to burn to CD. I had no issues. :)
Because of the WMA content though, unfortunately it may never be on the Mac, which is a downer.

]]> By: Jenna http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10722 Jenna Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.scriptygoddess.com/archives/2003/10/30/napster-vs-itunes/#comment-10722 napster isn't available for mac os (or various others including windows 95 & windows NT). go figure. napster isn’t available for mac os (or various others including windows 95 & windows NT). go figure.

]]>